Wis.-Green Bay
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
879  Mitchell Bilitz SR 33:29
1,794  Erik Johnson SR 34:46
2,743  Joshua Langteau FR 37:37
2,781  Samuel Engel JR 37:52
2,850  Jacob Fierst JR 38:37
2,906  Adam Plough FR 39:30
National Rank #285 of 315
Great Lakes Region Rank #31 of 31
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Mitchell Bilitz Erik Johnson Joshua Langteau Samuel Engel Jacob Fierst Adam Plough
UW-Parkside Vic Godfrey Open 09/09 1355 33:27 34:20 37:15 37:19 38:49 41:26
Bradley Intercollegiate 09/15 1341 32:38 34:21 37:16 42:24 38:58 42:46
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/29 1452 35:41 36:44 37:22 37:17 40:06
Bradley Pink Classic 10/13 1505 33:13 34:59 39:48 38:30 39:58 40:06
Horizon League Championship 10/28 1420 34:03 34:39 37:54 37:17 38:13 40:03
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/10 1456 34:15 34:46 37:50 38:20 39:07 38:42





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.3 889 0.2 2.5 17.4 43.2 22.5 14.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mitchell Bilitz 94.7
Erik Johnson 157.9
Joshua Langteau 208.1
Samuel Engel 209.9
Jacob Fierst 213.0
Adam Plough 214.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 2.5% 2.5 26
27 17.4% 17.4 27
28 43.2% 43.2 28
29 22.5% 22.5 29
30 14.4% 14.4 30
31 31
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0